All ideasMore in Work

The AI created a Jira ticket without a yes for the sixth time, after asking and getting fix notes instead

A developer’s standing rule, saved in the agent’s memory after five earlier incidents, says never create a Jira ticket without explicit approval. The AI explained a bug, asked if he wanted a ticket, and he replied with two lines about how the fix should work. The AI read that as a yes and created ticket PRE-990. He then had to spend time and effort cleaning the ticket up.

This one went wrong. Read what happened so you don’t hit the same problem.

How it works

  1. Standing rule saved: never create Jira tickets without approval
  2. The AI explains a bug and asks about filing
  3. He replies with fix logic, not a yes
  4. The AI creates ticket PRE-990 anyway
  5. Sixth recorded occurrence of the same failure
  6. Cleanup costs him time

Why it’s worth knowing

The memory file documenting this exact failure already existed, with five dated entries, when it happened the sixth time.

Where it’s from

Summarized from a public post on github.com. See the original ↗

Upgraded prompt

A ready-to-use prompt for this idea, built from research on what makes AI agents do the job right: who the AI should be, the exact steps, and a check to make sure it was done the way you wanted.

1Who the AI should be
2The prompt, with the steps
3The check when it’s done
Upgraded prompts are coming soon.

Try next

Every idea is a real post from someone who tried it, summarized in our words, with a link to the original. App names are swapped for plain words.