The AI checked a paper's references and found two were made up
A peer reviewer put a manuscript's reference list into AI and asked it to find a web link for each one. Two references were fictitious and 13 more looked suspect, so the reviewer rejected the paper.
How it works
- Finds a fake reference in the introduction
- Pastes all the references into AI and asks it to find web links
- Checks one of the references the AI could not find
- Counts two fictitious and 13 suspect references
- Decides to reject the manuscript
Why it’s worth knowing
Two of the paper's references did not exist at all, and the AI surfaced them before the reviewer had finished page two.
Where it’s from
Summarized from a public post on bsky.app. See the original ↗