All ideasMore in Work

He bought $200 of extra credits to finish a job; a fan-out workflow drained them while most of its agents never ran

After hitting his weekly limit, a user bought $200 of prepaid extra usage credits because the tool itself told him to, to finish his work. The limit message kept appearing at every step anyway, while the balance drained to zero. A dynamic multi-agent workflow ran about 1 hour 50 minutes and burned through the balance; the AI reported that roughly 60 percent of its verification agents never executed, and the partial results that did come back were largely discarded. The $200 bought an incomplete verification.

$200at stake
This one went wrong. Read what happened so you don’t hit the same problem.

How it works

  1. Weekly limit hit
  2. Tool suggests buying credits
  3. He buys $200
  4. The limit block continues while the balance drains
  5. A fan-out workflow runs about 1 hour 50 minutes
  6. About 60 percent of its agents never run
  7. Balance reaches zero with the verification incomplete

Why it’s worth knowing

He paid to remove a block. The block stayed, the money left, and most of what it bought never even ran.

Where it’s from

Summarized from a public post on github.com. See the original ↗

Upgraded prompt

A ready-to-use prompt for this idea, built from research on what makes AI agents do the job right: who the AI should be, the exact steps, and a check to make sure it was done the way you wanted.

1Who the AI should be
2The prompt, with the steps
3The check when it’s done
Upgraded prompts are coming soon.

Try next

Every idea is a real post from someone who tried it, summarized in our words, with a link to the original. App names are swapped for plain words.