Claimed she hadn't sent an email she had in fact sent; trusting

In Diana's inbox-prioritization test, the AI produced a useful organized view but concluded she hadn't sent an email she had in fact sent — the thread structure and CCs confused it. If she'd trusted the first answer, she'd have sent a duplicate email.

This one went wrong. Read what happened so you don’t hit the same problem.

Where it’s from

Summarized from a public post on aiagentslibrary.com. See the original ↗

Upgraded prompt

A ready-to-use prompt for this idea, built from research on what makes AI agents do the job right: who the AI should be, the exact steps, and a check to make sure it was done the way you wanted.

1Who the AI should be

2The prompt, with the steps

3The check when it’s done

Upgraded prompts are coming soon.

Try next

Life adminSpark Sorted a Real Inbox, Archived 9 Threads and Flagged a Spam Comment Unprompted Life adminSecurity-review a suspicious email that passed every check Life adminA Scheduled Spark Check Ran on Its Own and Surfaced a Bill and a Government Notice Life adminCatch it when an event moves but nobody tells me

Every idea is a real post from someone who tried it, summarized in our words, with a link to the original. App names are swapped for plain words.